SPECS CONTENT...
Checking in with first comparisons between the E6D and the E10D. Right off the bat I could see/feel that the 6 was a
lot bigger. The neck width, depth and overall weight!
However, when I measured and weighed, this is what I came up with:
E6D E10D
String spacing
@ nut: 1 31/64" 1 31/64"
@saddle: 2 6/32" 2 5/32"
Neck depth
@ 1st fret: .870" .843"
@ 9th fret: .904" .855"
Neck width
@ 1st fret: 1 13/16" - 1.78"
@ 9th fret: 2.08" - 2.01"
Weight 5 lb 4.5 lb
If you can imagine the feel of these 2 guitars just from reading the numbers, well you're better than I am. Therein lies the problem of trying to picture a guitar, based on its specs. For me anyway. I don't know if you see the spec-differences as significant or minor, but holding one and then the other, I
feel them as significant!
At this point of the process, I'm just A/B-ing them for comfort...how one feels in my hand as compared to the other. It won't be a fair fight - tonewise - until I get a proper setup on the 6.
Play along: can you tell which is which?
More to come...