Romeo

[gnappi]

Looks like guitar.com has done a short writeup:

https://guitar.com/news/gear-news/eastma...-acoustic/

Is it a full hollow, or semi-hollow? I reckon it's mainly hollow barring the neck joint and bridge/tailpiece area. Speculating for now, happy to be re-educated.

Flat top or archtop? I reckon a very slight arch to the top and back. The bridge pickup ring is slightly curved and there is some indicator in the photography to suggest an arched back as well.

You can study the image here:

https://www.eastmanguitars.com/new_models

My main dislikes?

For USD2199, they could have done fingerboard and f-hole binding, like they do for so many of their other guitars.

Stylistically, the lower horn looks weird; I reckon if they shortened it slightly to protrude no farther beyond the 17th fret, it would look a lot more balanced. But I'm just nitpicking here.

One thing I do like: that headstock. Straighter string pull, but the revised 'small' headstock has already brought the other models closer to that, so I do wonder why they didn't just reuse the same shape.

+1 on the head I like that, and "F" hole binding? a nit for sure but still there and the mini review claims the neck is mahogany, well I'll bet the Eastman guys got that right calling it maple?

Like some other gits I've owned it "looks" like a flat top which would make a PG a PITA but the controls that far forward are just stupid. Reverend, some PRS,  Fret King and others made the misteak (spelling deliberate) and may not have known that it limits their buying audience. W-H-Y do that? If they really needed room for controls the switch could have easily gone on the horn and the controls taken away from forward of the bridge.

Speaking of Fret King, the Romeo is VERY similar (except the head) to the Fret King Elise and they made the same control location blunder... the main reason I wouldn't even consider the Elise at 1/2 the price of the Romeo.

https://ibb.co/cb2s83p